I would vote NO on Gay Marriage.

The way Marriage is Defined is not intended or meant for two men or Two women.

I DO however vote that they, meaning our Government SHOULD have an Alternative-Life-Partnership or Unionization which is legitimate and binding for Homosexuals.

I am not going to go into details but this really is a pissing contest of words so to speak... so I say... then lets find a different word and make it so.

All I am going to say is this .. dont mess with Marriage or the definition of marriage!

Don't try to reinvent the wheel, or change the whole system.. rather.... change it in a small amount.. compromise, I fail to understand how a "ALL MY WAY OR THE HIGHWAY... all or nothing" stance on this issue is going to help change ANYONES mind... to me that is very immature and ridiculous.

Just make another WHEEL entirely. Make a new System, and change the old system in small amounts.

If its outdated... lets update it.

I dont see why people fuss on Marriage when its just a word, but.... lets just let them have it thier way.

Make up a new word for Homosexual "Marriage" and then lets get the same legal rights... there,... end of story.... make them an offer they can't refuse or else they will be bigots and haters...

Now tell me who wants to be that.... (esp if running for a potential Governmental High Standing Office)